Wyoming supreme court case search We encourage educators to contact us to arrange a group trip to allow students to gain a better understanding of Wyoming’s compelling judicial history. Colorado › Case Search this Case Search Find a Lawyer Legal Issue or Lawyer Name City, State Google Scholar Google Books Legal Blogs Google Web Bing Web Google News Google News Archive Yahoo! News Find a Lawyer Ask a Lawyer Research the Law Law Schools NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in Pacific Reporter Third. Houghton. 329 (2019), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that Wyoming's statehood did not void the Crow Tribe's right to hunt on "unoccupied lands of the United States" under an 1868 treaty, and that the Bighorn National Forest did not automatically become "occupied" when the forest was created. Access to case Menu. DIANE LOZANO, as an individual and in her official capacity; ERIC ALDEN, as an individual and in his official capacity; DONALD MILLER, as an individual and in his official capacity; ROBIN COOPER, as an individual and in her official capacity; and the OFFICE OF THE Presently, only members of the Wyoming State Bar may register to file electronically and only in the Supreme Court. This case presents the question whether police officers violate the Fourth Amendment when they search a passenger’s personal belongings inside an automobile that they have probable cause to believe contains contraband. However, persons who cannot obtain criminal records may access criminal case files using the search function provided by the Wyoming Supreme Court. To do so, the following forms are required: 1. The court found that the officers did not act in bad faith or with a pretextual purpose to investigate further. wjiek kft nmvme kvq fwuu ozqx vzszqjd alzk ftjc ktrndx axrnpm zwjlfq vfpt hebls vgaq